Jordan on Film

Jordan Chodorow reviews movies on a scale of zero to four stars. Find reviews of all the latest releases here, along with a searchable database of all reviews from January 2012 to today.

Showing posts with label Luke Evans. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Luke Evans. Show all posts

Friday, March 17, 2017

Beauty and the Beast




Stop the presses!
Read more »
Posted by Jordan Chodorow at 11:16 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Tags: Audra McDonald, Beauty and the Beast, Bill Condon, Dan Stevens, Emma Thompson, Emma Watson, Ewan McGregor, Gugu Mbatha-Raw, Ian McKellen, Josh Gad, Luke Evans, Nathan Mack, Stanley Tucci

Tuesday, May 28, 2013

Fast & Furious 6




Is there a better action franchise at the moment than the Fast and the Furious? I don't think so.
Read more »
Posted by Jordan Chodorow at 4:24 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Tags: Chris "Ludacris" Bridges, Chris Morgan, Dwayne Johnson, Fast & Furious 6, Jordana Brewster, Justin Lin, Luke Evans, Michelle Rodriguez, Paul Walker, Sung Kang, Tyrese Gibson, Vin Diesel
Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

About Me

My photo
Jordan Chodorow
Los Angeles, CA, United States
Jordan Chodorow is a tax attorney in Los Angeles. He has been a professional film critic, a U.S. Open tennis umpire, a two-time national bridge champion, and a four-time California crossword champion. He enjoys attending concerts, Clippers and Kings games, theater, and of course movies with his boyfriend of seventeen years, Daniel.
View my complete profile

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2020 (3)
    • ▼  April (1)
      • The Films of 2020 (B.C.)
    • ►  February (2)
  • ►  2019 (3)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2018 (35)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  July (5)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (15)
  • ►  2017 (40)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (13)
  • ►  2016 (71)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (6)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (5)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (8)
    • ►  January (18)
  • ►  2015 (103)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (6)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (10)
    • ►  June (14)
    • ►  May (7)
    • ►  April (9)
    • ►  March (11)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (25)
  • ►  2014 (140)
    • ►  December (11)
    • ►  November (11)
    • ►  October (9)
    • ►  September (10)
    • ►  August (14)
    • ►  July (11)
    • ►  June (7)
    • ►  May (11)
    • ►  April (7)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (16)
    • ►  January (28)
  • ►  2013 (288)
    • ►  December (24)
    • ►  November (21)
    • ►  October (21)
    • ►  September (33)
    • ►  August (28)
    • ►  July (23)
    • ►  June (29)
    • ►  May (32)
    • ►  April (26)
    • ►  March (12)
    • ►  February (17)
    • ►  January (22)
  • ►  2012 (218)
    • ►  December (22)
    • ►  November (13)
    • ►  October (8)
    • ►  September (30)
    • ►  August (20)
    • ►  July (24)
    • ►  June (17)
    • ►  May (10)
    • ►  April (20)
    • ►  March (22)
    • ►  February (21)
    • ►  January (11)
  • ►  2011 (22)
    • ►  September (9)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  February (5)
    • ►  January (7)

Pages

  • Reviews

Ratings Guide

  • 4 Stars - Excellent on every level; one of the few best films of the year.
  • 3 1/2 Stars - Superior; one of the top 20 films of the year.
  • 3 Stars - Strongly recommended.
  • 2 1/2 Stars - Mildly recommended.
  • 2 Stars - Mildly discommended, though not without meritorious elements.
  • 1 1/2 Stars - Poor.
  • 1 Star - Quite poor.
  • 1/2 Star - Exceptionally poor on an artistic level and distasteful on one or more additional levels.
  • 0 Stars - Fails on the most rudimentary technical level and/or merits extraordinary condemnation.

Search This Blog
Awesome Inc. theme. Powered by Blogger.